From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3743 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2002 16:13:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3735 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 16:13:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO postman.eglin.af.mil) (129.61.46.202) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 16:13:50 -0000 Received: from mailscan2.eglin.af.mil (mailscan2.eglin.af.mil [129.61.2.55]) by postman.eglin.af.mil (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g85GDiqq023184 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:13:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from filter2.eglin.af.mil ([129.61.2.38]) by mailscan2.eglin.af.mil (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2002090511110019678 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 11:11:00 -0500 Received: FROM hub2.eglin.af.mil BY filter2.eglin.af.mil ; Thu Sep 05 11:13:45 2002 -0500 Received: by hub2.eglin.af.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: <30C9E24891FFD411B68A009027724CB702C04D73@eg-002-015.eglin.af.mil> From: Keen Wayne A Contr AFRL/MNGG To: "'gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org'" Subject: Re: size of executable Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 09:13:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Also note that (in my experience), I did not start to see performance improvements on the PC (particularly P4) until I started doing processor specific optimizations (eg. -mcpu=pentium4). When I got my act together with options, I started getting ~15% improvement. Running strip made things almost as small, but no performance improvement came from it....at leasrt for us. Your experience may differ.... Wayne Keen