From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E953858C52 for ; Sat, 14 May 2022 16:42:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 22E953858C52 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-oetec-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.917, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DKIM_VALID_EF -0.10, NICE_REPLY_A -0.81, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00) X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 24EGgD9K031024 X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact oetec for more information Received: from [10.14.0.3] (static-198-54-132-36.cust.tzulo.com [198.54.132.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8+deb9u1) with ESMTPSA id 24EGgD9K031024 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 14 May 2022 12:42:15 -0400 Message-ID: <31226bc8-df0d-94f7-65fd-1002715e0539@blastwave.org> Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 12:42:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: bootstrap fails on Debian ppc64 with fatal error: bits/libc-header-start.h: No such file or directory Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: gcc-help References: <7f1f1a2f-6c9f-d3ad-8aa1-499c87eb8caf@blastwave.org> <05fc1487-9080-5822-4e32-81cf49d13961@blastwave.org> <91d0b89c-2001-1b2c-cbd7-d9b390c9ee8b@blastwave.org> From: Dennis Clarke In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 16:42:23 -0000 On 5/14/22 03:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2022 at 00:22, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> >>>>> Honestly, I find that hard to believe. >>>> >>>> Me too! . . . >> Those folks working on gmp and mpfr really are the experts. The page >> says : >> >> https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/#download >> >> The bugs listed below have been fixed (latest update: 2021-05-17). >> >> See https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/#fixed >> >> Thirteen bug fixes and from what I have heard directly from some good >> folks the code in GMP has been subjected to an actual proof. The MPFR >> code is in process. I gather those bug fixes are valuable and trivial >> to apply. In fact the download_prerequisites script could be updated >> to fetch the patches and just apply them. > > They don't affect the code GCC uses. In that case I will apply them. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional