From: manaankit2 <ankit.anand1@wipro.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC Options
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32194123.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFio4NczEW1GT0RQmK7zZkCFpCeSvEorQ2MFAPudcHpn6YE5Tw@mail.gmail.com>
John Need one more help. I was trying to compile the code but i got the error
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
These were for certain functions for which i have some other module which
creates the lib for them.
In gcc i am providing the -l*** option where *** is the module where those
objects are available.
Can you help me to sort this issue.
Thanks for the help.
Ankit
John Graham-9 wrote:
>
> Well, gcc (4.4.3) tells me that "-+" is an unrecognised option, so it
> may be a typo in the makefile...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:10 AM, manaankit2 <ankit.anand1@wipro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanx John. I mean -+ only. Anyways thanks for the help.
>>
>>
>> John Graham-9 wrote:
>>>
>>> "$<" is a make automatic variable - see
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Automatic-Variables.html#Automatic-Variables.
>>>
>>> I don't know what the "-+" switch is - I couldn't find one in the gcc
>>> man page. Are you sure you don't mean "$+"? That would be another make
>>> variable.
>>>
>>> John G
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:45 AM, manaankit2 <ankit.anand1@wipro.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Can some one please explain to me what are these options in it.
>>>>
>>>> gcc -c -+ $< -m64 $(CCFLAGS)
>>>>
>>>> I understand -c, -m64 and $CCFLAGS but i am not able to understand the
>>>> use
>>>> of -+ and $<.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://old.nabble.com/GCC-Options-tp32191782p32191782.html
>>>> Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/GCC-Options-tp32191782p32192112.html
>> Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GCC-Options-tp32191782p32194123.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-04 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 5:45 manaankit2
2011-08-04 6:51 ` John Graham
2011-08-04 7:10 ` manaankit2
2011-08-04 8:15 ` John Graham
2011-08-04 12:53 ` manaankit2 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-01 6:03 gcc options michael.shapiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32194123.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=ankit.anand1@wipro.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).