* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
@ 2011-06-02 2:16 Dennis Clarke
2011-06-02 2:25 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 18:28 ` kevin diggs
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Clarke @ 2011-06-02 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Cunningham; +Cc: gcc-help
> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time decided
> to
> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object
> files.
> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does anyone
> know what this means?
>
How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha and you
are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with binutils
maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic while facing east
with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
My guess is that you need to face west.
Try again with some content please !
Dennis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 2:16 gcc-4.6.0 breaks Dennis Clarke
@ 2011-06-02 2:25 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 8:12 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-06-02 18:28 ` kevin diggs
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Bill Cunningham @ 2011-06-02 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time
>> decided to
>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object
>> files.
>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does
>> anyone know what this means?
>>
>
> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>
> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha and
> you are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with
> binutils maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic
> while facing east with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>
> My guess is that you need to face west.
>
> Try again with some content please !
I didn't get a log of stderr. I wish I had it turned on now. I'm using
an old RH 9 for the i686 and binutils-2.21 along with gcc-3.3.6. I have have
gmp mpfc and mpc all installed and I am using make-3.82. I was rather
surprised when it broke. If I try again I will get a stderr log.
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 2:25 ` Bill Cunningham
@ 2011-06-02 8:12 ` Jonathan Wakely
[not found] ` <002701cc2103$ef433780$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2011-06-02 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Cunningham; +Cc: gcc-help
On 2 June 2011 03:25, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time
>>> decided to
>>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object
>>> files.
>>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does
>>> anyone know what this means?
>>>
>>
>> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>>
>> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha and
>> you are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with
>> binutils maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic
>> while facing east with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>>
>> My guess is that you need to face west.
>>
>> Try again with some content please !
>
> I didn't get a log of stderr. I wish I had it turned on now. I'm using an
> old RH 9 for the i686 and binutils-2.21 along with gcc-3.3.6. I have have
> gmp mpfc and mpc all installed and I am using make-3.82. I was rather
> surprised when it broke. If I try again I will get a stderr log.
Couldn't you have used a pencil to write down the actual text of the error?
Was it this error: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix ?
Did you read the installation docs about --with-gmp and ensuring the
dynamic linker can find libgmp etc?
See http://advogato.org/person/redi/diary/240.html and/or
http://advogato.org/person/redi/diary/229.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 2:16 gcc-4.6.0 breaks Dennis Clarke
2011-06-02 2:25 ` Bill Cunningham
@ 2011-06-02 18:28 ` kevin diggs
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kevin diggs @ 2011-06-02 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dclarke; +Cc: Bill Cunningham, gcc-help
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time decided
>> to
>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object
>> files.
>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does anyone
>> know what this means?
>>
>
> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>
> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha and you
> are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with binutils
> maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic while facing east
> with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>
I thought it was "widely known" that under a rising moon, the cat HAD
to at least be on life support. It could not be completely dead?!?
> My guess is that you need to face west.
>
> Try again with some content please !
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
@ 2011-06-02 2:29 Dennis Clarke
2011-06-02 2:47 ` Bill Cunningham
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Clarke @ 2011-06-02 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Cunningham; +Cc: gcc-help
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time
>>> decided to
>>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object
>>> files.
>>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does
>>> anyone know what this means?
>>>
>>
>> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>>
>> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha and
>> you are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with
>> binutils maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic
>> while facing east with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>>
>> My guess is that you need to face west.
>>
>> Try again with some content please !
>
> I didn't get a log of stderr. I wish I had it turned on now. I'm using
> an old RH 9 for the i686 and binutils-2.21 along with gcc-3.3.6. I have
> have
> gmp mpfc and mpc all installed and I am using make-3.82. I was rather
> surprised when it broke. If I try again I will get a stderr log.
>
Can you just login remotely with an xterm or better yet fire up screen
with session logging and then go to a fresh clean directory. Then let's
try a boot strap again and this time everything gets logged.
wdyt ?
Dennis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 2:29 Dennis Clarke
@ 2011-06-02 2:47 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 3:11 ` Bryan Hundven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Bill Cunningham @ 2011-06-02 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time
>>>> decided to
>>>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized
>>>> object files.
>>>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does
>>>> anyone know what this means?
>>>>
>>>
>>> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>>>
>>> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha
>>> and you are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with
>>> binutils maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic
>>> while facing east with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>>>
>>> My guess is that you need to face west.
>>>
>>> Try again with some content please !
>>
>> I didn't get a log of stderr. I wish I had it turned on now. I'm
>> using an old RH 9 for the i686 and binutils-2.21 along with
>> gcc-3.3.6. I have have
>> gmp mpfc and mpc all installed and I am using make-3.82. I was rather
>> surprised when it broke. If I try again I will get a stderr log.
>>
>
> Can you just login remotely with an xterm or better yet fire up screen
> with session logging and then go to a fresh clean directory. Then
> let's try a boot strap again and this time everything gets logged.
>
> wdyt ?
Nope. Don't have X on my system. Never installed it and removed what few
directories were left. I have xfree86 binaries but they are kind of old and
want an even newer glibc than I have I believe. But I can still get errors
logged with the shell.
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 2:47 ` Bill Cunningham
@ 2011-06-02 3:11 ` Bryan Hundven
2011-06-02 4:59 ` Miles Bader
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Hundven @ 2011-06-02 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Cunningham; +Cc: gcc-help
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Bill Cunningham <billcun@suddenlink.net> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time
>>>>> decided to
>>>>> break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized
>>>>> object files.
>>>>> I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does
>>>>> anyone know what this means?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How would anyone even begin to help with this email content ?
>>>>
>>>> Okay, so let's see, so you're running Debian Linux on a DEC alpha
>>>> and you are trying to bootstrap GCC 4.6.0 while using GCC 3.3.6 with
>>>> binutils maybe maybe not and your configure line was black magic
>>>> while facing east with a dead cat under a rising moon ?
>>>>
>>>> My guess is that you need to face west.
>>>>
>>>> Try again with some content please !
>>>
>>> I didn't get a log of stderr. I wish I had it turned on now. I'm
>>> using an old RH 9 for the i686 and binutils-2.21 along with
>>> gcc-3.3.6. I have have
>>> gmp mpfc and mpc all installed and I am using make-3.82. I was rather
>>> surprised when it broke. If I try again I will get a stderr log.
>>>
>>
>> Can you just login remotely with an xterm or better yet fire up screen
>> with session logging and then go to a fresh clean directory. Then
>> let's try a boot strap again and this time everything gets logged.
>>
>> wdyt ?
>
> Nope. Don't have X on my system. Never installed it and removed what few
> directories were left. I have xfree86 binaries but they are kind of old and
> want an even newer glibc than I have I believe. But I can still get errors
> logged with the shell.
$ apt-get install screen
$ screen -L
$ build your toolchain
$ exit
post screenlog.0
> Bill
>
>
-Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 3:11 ` Bryan Hundven
@ 2011-06-02 4:59 ` Miles Bader
2011-06-02 8:31 ` Bryan Hundven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Miles Bader @ 2011-06-02 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Hundven; +Cc: Bill Cunningham, gcc-help
Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> writes:
> $ apt-get install screen
Amen.
-miles
--
Cat, n. A soft, indestructible automaton provided by nature to be kicked when
things go wrong in the domestic circle.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc-4.6.0 breaks
2011-06-02 4:59 ` Miles Bader
@ 2011-06-02 8:31 ` Bryan Hundven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Hundven @ 2011-06-02 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miles Bader; +Cc: Bill Cunningham, gcc-help
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> writes:
>> $ apt-get install screen
>
> Amen.
HAHA, I just realized Bill said rh, not deb :-P
I like Jonathan's pencil idea too!
The manual printer, ftw!
$ yum install screen
> -miles
>
> --
> Cat, n. A soft, indestructible automaton provided by nature to be kicked when
> things go wrong in the domestic circle.
-Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* gcc-4.6.0 breaks
@ 2011-06-02 2:11 Bill Cunningham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Bill Cunningham @ 2011-06-02 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
My gcc-4.6.0 compilation after compiling for quite some time decided to
break with an error to stderr of something like not recognized object files.
I am compiling with gcc-3.3.6. This can sure be nerve racking. Does anyone
know what this means?
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-02 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-02 2:16 gcc-4.6.0 breaks Dennis Clarke
2011-06-02 2:25 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 8:12 ` Jonathan Wakely
[not found] ` <002701cc2103$ef433780$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71>
[not found] ` <BANLkTinaXqk2ts7q8n3-Uoa=z0B2-xwR6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-02 11:22 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 11:32 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-06-02 12:17 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 14:11 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-06-02 14:21 ` Marc Glisse
2011-06-02 15:06 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-06-02 19:41 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 18:28 ` kevin diggs
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-02 2:29 Dennis Clarke
2011-06-02 2:47 ` Bill Cunningham
2011-06-02 3:11 ` Bryan Hundven
2011-06-02 4:59 ` Miles Bader
2011-06-02 8:31 ` Bryan Hundven
2011-06-02 2:11 Bill Cunningham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).