* gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
@ 2004-01-23 14:44 Crescioli, Phil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Crescioli, Phil @ 2004-01-23 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hello,
I'm investigating gcc3.2.X and am wondering if there is a big
change in the way this release/version (or gcc3.3.X or 3.4)
handles concurrent multi-language source file compilation
(as compared to older versions of gcc (as far back as gcc2.9.5)).
Also wondering which version is currently the most stable: gcc3.2.X,
gcc3.3.X, or gcc3.4.
Thanks,
Phil Crescioli
GENERAL DYNAMICS
Advanced Information Systems
phil.crescioli@gd-ais.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
@ 2004-01-23 20:40 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2004-01-23 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phil.Crescioli; +Cc: gcc-help
For SPARC, I'd strongly recommend gcc 3.3.2 over 3.2.x
since it has many SPARC specific bugfixes.
Dara
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
@ 2004-01-23 15:49 Adam Stein
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Adam Stein @ 2004-01-23 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help, Phil.Crescioli
>All,
>I should have mentioned that the platform I'm using is
>sun-sparc-solaris2.8. I did noticed that the build status
>info at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/buildstat.html
>did not include test results for gcc3.3.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8.
>Has anyone built gcc3.3.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 or is this build
>status info a little not-up-to date due to not everyone contributing
>their build status test results...
I'm using v3.3.2 on a Solaris 8 machine. Have been for a while. Have had no
problems that I'm aware of.
Adam
--
Adam Stein @ Xerox Corporation Email: adam@scan.mc.xerox.com
Disclaimer: All views expressed
here have been proved to be my own. [http://www.csh.rit.edu/~adam/]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
@ 2004-01-23 15:43 Crescioli, Phil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Crescioli, Phil @ 2004-01-23 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
All,
I should have mentioned that the platform I'm using is
sun-sparc-solaris2.8. I did noticed that the build status
info at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/buildstat.html
did not include test results for gcc3.3.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8.
Has anyone built gcc3.3.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 or is this build
status info a little not-up-to date due to not everyone contributing
their build status test results...
-----Original Message-----
From: Crescioli, Phil
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:44 AM
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
Hello,
I'm investigating gcc3.2.X and am wondering if there is a big
change in the way this release/version (or gcc3.3.X or 3.4)
handles concurrent multi-language source file compilation
(as compared to older versions of gcc (as far back as gcc2.9.5)).
Also wondering which version is currently the most stable: gcc3.2.X,
gcc3.3.X, or gcc3.4.
Thanks,
Phil Crescioli
GENERAL DYNAMICS
Advanced Information Systems
phil.crescioli@gd-ais.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-23 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-23 14:44 gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4 Crescioli, Phil
2004-01-23 15:43 Crescioli, Phil
2004-01-23 15:49 Adam Stein
2004-01-23 20:40 Dara Hazeghi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).