public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X
@ 2004-10-05 18:03 lrtaylor
  2004-10-21 16:13 ` Nix
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: lrtaylor @ 2004-10-05 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kutek, gcc-help

More information would be useful.  For example, what was your configure
line, where is GCC being installed, and where were you expecting it to
be installed?

Thanks,
Lyle


-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of kutek@cybercomm.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:56 AM
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X



it was consistent and easy, and all i needed to recreate my
configuration on
later versions was do a gcc -v and copy the options shown.

now, everything is going to places that gcc never resided in before..who
was
the genius who did this... and why????

how do i get the install back to pre 3.4.X behavior ?


thanks

fractoid

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X
  2004-10-05 18:03 changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X lrtaylor
@ 2004-10-21 16:13 ` Nix
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nix @ 2004-10-21 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lrtaylor; +Cc: kutek, gcc-help

On 5 Oct 2004, lrtaylor@micron.com stated:
> More information would be useful.  For example, what was your configure
> line, where is GCC being installed, and where were you expecting it to
> be installed?

The original poster may be referring to the move of GCC's tool
executables (cc1, cc1plus, collect2 and so on) into a subdirectory of
libexec (well, $libexecdir, where the GNU Coding Standards have always
suggested that `executable programs to be run by other programs' should
reside).

This was implemented by Geoff Keating in
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02803.html>
(the version that was finally committed was
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg03026.html>).
Nobody objected.

But you're right in that the complaint is vague enough that it
could refer to virtually anything else ;}

-- 
`[...] I certainly enjoyed putting it down. Perhaps I would have
 enjoyed putting it down even more if I were a veterinarian.'
     --- Mike Andrews on Dan Brown's _Digital Fortress_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X
@ 2004-10-05 17:02 kutek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kutek @ 2004-10-05 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help



it was consistent and easy, and all i needed to recreate my configuration on
later versions was do a gcc -v and copy the options shown.

now, everything is going to places that gcc never resided in before..who was
the genius who did this... and why????

how do i get the install back to pre 3.4.X behavior ?


thanks

fractoid

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-21 16:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-05 18:03 changes in installation locations with gcc 3.4.X lrtaylor
2004-10-21 16:13 ` Nix
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-05 17:02 kutek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).