From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24757 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2002 14:53:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24746 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2002 14:53:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO callisto.affordablehost.com) (206.104.238.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2002 14:53:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 29504 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2002 14:53:30 -0000 Received: from 12-238-66-88.client.attbi.com (HELO keyed-upsoftware.com) (12.238.66.88) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2002 14:53:30 -0000 Message-ID: <3CC180E1.9050109@keyed-upsoftware.com> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 08:37:00 -0000 From: David Stroupe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: Array Initialization warnings Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 Hi guys, Michal Liptak wrote: > > I think the internal representation of int[4][4] is the same as int[16] > m. > That is usually the case, i would think, but i am not sure, it is required by the standard, so i would not rely on that. Just to clarify...the standard requires the brackets be placed as in your example? If so, guess I had best get to bracketing my arrays. I really did not want to have to go back and recode my array that looks like this: BYTE SUBIMG_NTSC[2][2][4][3][8] = {... Thanks to all for the info!!