From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25104 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 07:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25077 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 07:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp0.euronet.nl) (194.134.35.141) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 07:29:28 -0000 Received: from koffie.nl (i1184.vwr.wanadoo.nl [194.134.212.165]) by smtp0.euronet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B79924779; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:29:26 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E41FAA5.2010309@koffie.nl> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 07:29:00 -0000 From: Segher Boessenkool User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Love-Jensen Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_O_Johansen?= , gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Optimise a build for floating point operation References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 John Love-Jensen wrote: > Hi Øystein, > If IEEE 754 compliance doesn't matter to you, you could get a little more > performance out of -mno-ieee-fp. With similar warnings, -ffast-math can help too. Segher