From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-12151-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4804 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 13:43:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4796 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 13:43:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gate.algorithm.aelita.com) (212.176.18.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 13:43:26 -0000
Received: from bagman.edm.com ([10.0.0.4]) by gate.algorithm.aelita.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>;
          Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:43:23 +0400
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: gcc 3.3: long long bug?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 13:43:00 -0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Message-ID: <3F6F4712B759A34ABD453A8B39C10D624802C5@bagman.edm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Lev Assinovsky" <LAssinovsky@algorithm.aelita.com>
To: "A.R. Ashok Kumar" <ashokar@sankhya.com>
Cc: "Andreas Schwab" <schwab@suse.de>,
	"Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
	<gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2

No I meant MSVC 6.2 on Windows.
Yes, it works without any suffixes=20
with 3.2 on Unix.
Also this:
const long long n =3D  100000000 * 1000000000;

works with 3.3 on Unix either.=20

----
Lev Assinovsky
Aelita Software Corporation
O&S Core Division, Programmer
ICQ# 165072909


> -----Original Message-----
> From: A.R. Ashok Kumar [mailto:ashokar@sankhya.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 5:35 PM
> To: Lev Assinovsky
> Cc: Andreas Schwab; Eric Botcazou; gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: gcc 3.3: long long bug?
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> > No, what was the reason to change the behavior of 3.2?
> > We developing the portable application which should work
> > in Windows 2000 also.
> > There is an automatic recognition of long long constants in=20
> MSVC though you can=20
> > add i64 suffix.
> > With 3.3 I have to write:
> > const long long n =3D
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > 34359738368
> > #else
> > 34359738368LL
> > #endif
> > ;
> >=20
> > Not nice, right?
>=20
>   Is gcc3.3 for Win32 gives error for the following statement?
>=20
>     const long long n =3D 34359738368LL;
>=20
>   If so, it is not nice behaviour. Does it work for gcc 3.2 ?
>=20
> - AshokA -
>=20
>=20
>=20