From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-17737-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14444 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2004 05:10:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14434 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 05:10:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.206)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 05:10:32 -0000
Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so122394rnl
        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.72.72 with SMTP id u72mr1323496rna;
        Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.22.35 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3aa41a650408302210d03ca6d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 06:31:00 -0000
From: Oza Dhairesh <dhairesh@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Oza Dhairesh <dhairesh@gmail.com>
To: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Re: function calls before variable declarations does not give error in gcc?
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040830225651.01f46e20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3aa41a650408302022774d7486@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20040830225651.01f46e20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2

Hi

   Thanks Eljay.

   But even gcc -std=c89 dosnt give an error!! 

BR
Oza

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:58:44 -0500, Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Oza,
> 
> I believe that's actually not an error, according to C99.
> 
> GCC 2.96 (a misnomer for a maverick non-GCC release, since there wasn't a
> GCC 2.96, GCC went from 2.95 to 3.0) is probably following C89 standards.
> 
> HTH,
> --Eljay
> 
>