From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5754 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2004 15:13:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5745 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 15:13:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.jpl.nasa.gov) (137.78.160.40) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 15:13:02 -0000 Received: from jpl.nasa.gov (berea.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.218.175]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3DFD152027869 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <407C037D.9030801@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:13:00 -0000 From: Tim Canham Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ cont Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 I posted a message earlier about the __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ symbols in our gcc code. A number of people on the list sent messages, the gist of which seemed to be that they only appear if they are referenced in the code. I was able to reproduce that on a small scale, but something in our large build is producing those symbols without us referencing them. We don't have them in our code. Is there anything else that would cause them to be generated besides user code referring to them? -- Timothy K. Canham Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA Timothy.Canham@jpl.nasa.gov MDS Flight Software