From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17884 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2005 09:17:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17836 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2005 09:17:26 -0000 Received: from dumbledore.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:17:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 24152 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2005 09:17:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.189.167?) (nathan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 7 Jul 2005 09:17:24 -0000 Message-ID: <42CCF329.7020907@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:17:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michele Dall'Arno CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Inline assembly and extended instruction sets References: <42CC6F51.4070007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42CC6F51.4070007@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 Michele Dall'Arno wrote: > Is the union-way the best way to make C and asm able to exchange such > vectors? Why the program doesn't compile with union pointers? Any kind > of corrections and explanations would be greatly appreciated! use the mmx builtins, then you won't have to write asms at all. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk