From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10357 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2008 04:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 10349 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2008 04:28:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:27:27 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so1086593waf.20 for ; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.130.1 with SMTP id c1mr13315058wad.152.1217737645497; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.177.10 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 21:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42f6506e0808022127l3b5a961dgf8f9c62ed0459430@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:28:00 -0000 From: "Gaurav Jain" To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Error Compiling GCC on Solaris 10 / x86 Cc: Jay In-Reply-To: <48952BA7.72853359@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1217689174.6455.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> <48952BA7.72853359@dessent.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 > > That's really not a good idea to suggest given that the gcc docs > recommend *not* using the GNU linker with Solaris 10, and a combined > tree forces the in-tree linker which is GNU ld. > > > >> It is recommended that you configure GCC to use the GNU >> assembler in /usr/sfw/bin/gas but the Sun linker, using >> the options --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas >> --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld. Yes, I'm aware of that note. In fact, I specifically need to *try out* the GNU ld / GNU as combination to debug some issue in the binary that's being generated. I did find an old post from a user with a similar problem (see http://marc.info/?l=gcc&m=112111465407009&w=2) Even if it's not recommended, but I'm sure it sure does build fine with that combination?