From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17064 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2006 02:24:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2006 02:24:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dessent.net (HELO dessent.net) (69.60.119.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:24:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dessent.net) by dessent.net with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fpc6I-0006O7-16 for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:24:22 +0000 Message-ID: <448CD055.4A2C5D58@dessent.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 02:24:00 -0000 From: Brian Dessent Reply-To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: -fpic vs fPIC References: <20060612.102821.74755063.kaminaga@sm.sony.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 Hiroki Kaminaga wrote: > What is the difference of -fpic and -fPIC? > Is there any info doc? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#index-fpic-1614