public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Eschenberg <eschenb@cs.uni-frankfurt.de>
To: Shane R <crazguy22@hotmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Linux c++ opmization--- linux runs at half the speed of windows?
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F035B0.1050809@cs.uni-frankfurt.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY21-F250BABA055D5D844068C13AE790@phx.gbl>

Hi Shane,

I am wondering if you are using large memory support in linux (since you 
got 2GB)? I am asking, because on my system I experienced the following 
strange behavior:

Compiling a whole package, which is fairly big the compile time varies 
strongly between the setup of using  large memory support and when not 
using it. As soon as I use large memory support the compile times grows 
by a factor between 2 and 3, I never did a profiling, what exactly 
causes the slow down, it just seems obvious that the large memory 
support causes a massive slowdown (certainly on memory access). I wonder 
if you are basically having the same problem. Maybe, after collecting 
some profiling data, you might come to the conclusion that memory access 
takes a lot of time, maybe you could check against a kernel without 
large memory support.

I might be completely wrong, but it came across my mind, since you got 2 
GB of RAM and might have large memory support enabled.

Regards

-Sven


Shane R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this is the appropriate forum. Please direct me to the correct 
> one if it is not.
>
> I am trying to optimize a c++ application that I ported from a windows 
> system to Linux.
> The app is a terminal based application that does some one time file 
> io at the start then runs completely in memory. After the one time io 
> the app runs successive timed epochs on the same data in Windows as 
> Linux. The app is a program that runs some code for doing non-linear 
> optmization (math stuff).
>
> The reason why I am posting is that I timed the time it takes for the 
> application to complete an epoch. It take twice as long in Linux as 
> windows?!?!
>
> My system is an Intel Centrino Duo with 2gigs of ram. The application 
> is only using a fraction of available memory in windows and linux. The 
> application is single-threaded in both.
>
> I am using Visual Studio 2003 in Windows and when I type gcc -v I get:
> Target: i486-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/configure -v 
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr 
> --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib 
> --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls 
> --program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu 
> --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release 
> i486-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08 12:30 Shane R
2007-03-08 15:01 ` Andrew Haley
2007-03-08 16:10 ` Atwood, Robert C
2007-03-08 17:10 ` Sven Eschenberg [this message]
2007-03-12 22:06 ` Lawrence Crowl
2007-03-12 23:13   ` Artūras Moskvinas
2007-03-13  8:57   ` Galloth
2007-03-12 23:49 ` John Carter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45F035B0.1050809@cs.uni-frankfurt.de \
    --to=eschenb@cs.uni-frankfurt.de \
    --cc=crazguy22@hotmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).