public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: "Ian S. Worthington" <ianworthington@usa.net>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B203DB.1070308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <779mBLTfN5830S14.1202847900@cmsweb03.cms.usa.net>

Ian S. Worthington wrote:
> Hi Andrew --
> 
> Many thanks for your reply.
> 
> It looks like I've got glibc-devel installed and (almost) up to date:
> 
> # yum list glibc-devel
> Setting up repositories
> update                    100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> base                                                            1.1 kB 00:00
> addons                    100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> extras                    100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> Installed Packages
> glibc-devel.s390x                        2.3.4-2.36             installed
> Available Packages
> glibc-devel.s390x                        2.3.4-2.39             base
> glibc-devel.s390                         2.3.4-2.39             base

Ah, S/390.  You shoulda said.  :-)

OK, so there are .s390 and .s390x packages.  I guess one of these is for
/lib and one of these is for /lib64, but I'm not a S/390 expert.  You
only have the .s390x installed.

> I've now updated to .39 just in case but still only have that one copy. 
> 
> /usr/lib doesn't seem to have much in it.  Is this correct?

Maybe you really don't want to build the 32-bit libraries, you just
want the 64-bit versions.  In that case you can configure with --disable-multilib.

Andrew.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-12 20:25 Ian S. Worthington
2008-02-12 20:39 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-13  0:14 Ian S. Worthington
2008-02-12 22:22 Poor Yorick
2008-02-12 21:33 Ian S. Worthington
2008-02-13 11:37 ` Andrew Haley
2008-02-12 17:47 Ian S. Worthington
2008-02-12 17:59 ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47B203DB.1070308@redhat.com \
    --to=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ianworthington@usa.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).