From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13979 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2008 20:39:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 13970 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2008 20:39:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:38:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1CKcqkt026358; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:38:52 -0500 Received: from [10.11.14.19] (vpn-14-19.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.19]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1CKcp2J022138; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:38:51 -0500 Message-ID: <47B203DB.1070308@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071019) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ian S. Worthington" CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: make fails on ld: crti.o "no such file", but present in /usr/lib64 References: <779mBLTfN5830S14.1202847900@cmsweb03.cms.usa.net> In-Reply-To: <779mBLTfN5830S14.1202847900@cmsweb03.cms.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 Ian S. Worthington wrote: > Hi Andrew -- > > Many thanks for your reply. > > It looks like I've got glibc-devel installed and (almost) up to date: > > # yum list glibc-devel > Setting up repositories > update 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > base 1.1 kB 00:00 > addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > extras 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 > Reading repository metadata in from local files > Installed Packages > glibc-devel.s390x 2.3.4-2.36 installed > Available Packages > glibc-devel.s390x 2.3.4-2.39 base > glibc-devel.s390 2.3.4-2.39 base Ah, S/390. You shoulda said. :-) OK, so there are .s390 and .s390x packages. I guess one of these is for /lib and one of these is for /lib64, but I'm not a S/390 expert. You only have the .s390x installed. > I've now updated to .39 just in case but still only have that one copy. > > /usr/lib doesn't seem to have much in it. Is this correct? Maybe you really don't want to build the 32-bit libraries, you just want the 64-bit versions. In that case you can configure with --disable-multilib. Andrew.