From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31151 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2008 09:02:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 31142 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2008 09:02:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:02:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3792BBL003746; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:02:11 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (vpn-14-5.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.5]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3792AOo004753; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:02:10 -0400 Message-ID: <47F9E311.5030109@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Tikhomirov CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Using GCC compiler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 Anton Tikhomirov wrote: > As we're planning to compile our closed (commercial) product using GCC > compiler, new question arises - should we mention that we used GCC > compiler and where (documentation?) We would be happy for you to do that, but as far as I am aware the GNU General Public License imposes no requirement on you to do so. The full licence terms are contained in the COPYING file distributed with gcc. Also check the additional terms in the file libgcc2.c that cover distributing the gcc libraries that are linked with your binary when you compile with gcc. Andrew.