From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7171 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2008 20:09:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 7160 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2008 20:09:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dessent.net (HELO dessent.net) (69.60.119.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:08:36 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=dessent.net) by dessent.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KWcvx-00053g-NU; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:08:33 +0000 Message-ID: <48AF1CC0.4FC8BBC1@dessent.net> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:32:00 -0000 From: Brian Dessent Reply-To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Seyran Avanesyan CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: 64-bit gcc References: <200808191257.28899.zepm@gatech.edu> <48AE205D.C938E9EB@dessent.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 Seyran Avanesyan wrote: > Yes, the target was Windows, and the separate fork is in active > development, this is why I was looking for earlier versions. > According to some posts gcc3.2.0 should do that. But it isn't, so I was > wondering if instead of downloading binaries I might have to compile > GCC/MinGW myself to get that working. x86_64 support for *Linux* was in gcc 3.2. Not Windows x64. They are very different targets even though the underlying hardware might be the same. > And I'm also interested in compiling 64-bit targets using original GCC > (planning to move Linux soon). What do you mean by "original gcc"? Brian