* Passing arguments of function through registers
@ 2009-02-10 11:21 sumanth
2009-02-10 11:28 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sumanth @ 2009-02-10 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hi .
I successfully passed function arguments through registers in gcc-3.3.
Every thing seems okay except there is a reshuffling of registers
happening once the arguments are passed in registers.
see the below example code snippet.
int add(short int x,short int y,short int z)
{
return x+y+z;
}
main()
{
int a=5,b=6,c=7,d;
d=add(a,b,c);
}
and the objdump of add function is
00000134 <_add>:
134: c3 30 000030c3 mov r3,r0
136: c3 01 000001c3 mov r0,r1
138: c3 12 000012c3 mov r1,r2
13a: 00 0c 00000c00 add r0,r3,r0
13c: 80 00 00000080 add r0,r0,r1
13e: 04 08 00000804 rts
The arguments are clearly passed in to r0,r1,r2 but my compiler
reshuffled them to r3,r0,r1
my return value of a function goes to r0. since i declared r0-r3 as 1 in
CALL_USED_REGISTERS ,r0-r3
are not pushed in stack.
Can any one help me to avoid the reshuffling of registers ..the idle
case should be
00000134 <_add>:
134: add r0, r0,r1 ==> r0=r0+r1
138: add r0, r0, r2==> r0 = r0+r2
13c: rts
since the required values are already in r0,r1,r2.
PS: I am using gcc-3.3
Thanks,
Sumanth G
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Passing arguments of function through registers
2009-02-10 11:21 Passing arguments of function through registers sumanth
@ 2009-02-10 11:28 ` Andrew Haley
[not found] ` <499165AF.6090503@redpinesignals.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-02-10 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sumanth; +Cc: gcc-help
sumanth wrote:
> I successfully passed function arguments through registers in gcc-3.3.
> Every thing seems okay except there is a reshuffling of registers
> happening once the arguments are passed in registers.
>
> see the below example code snippet.
>
>
> int add(short int x,short int y,short int z)
> {
> return x+y+z;
> }
> main()
> {
> int a=5,b=6,c=7,d;
> d=add(a,b,c);
> }
>
> and the objdump of add function is
> 00000134 <_add>:
> 134: c3 30 000030c3 mov r3,r0
> 136: c3 01 000001c3 mov r0,r1
> 138: c3 12 000012c3 mov r1,r2
> 13a: 00 0c 00000c00 add r0,r3,r0
> 13c: 80 00 00000080 add r0,r0,r1
> 13e: 04 08 00000804 rts
>
>
> The arguments are clearly passed in to r0,r1,r2 but my compiler
> reshuffled them to r3,r0,r1
> my return value of a function goes to r0. since i declared r0-r3 as 1 in
> CALL_USED_REGISTERS ,r0-r3
> are not pushed in stack.
>
> Can any one help me to avoid the reshuffling of registers ..the idle
> case should be
> 00000134 <_add>:
> 134: add r0, r0,r1 ==> r0=r0+r1
> 138: add r0, r0, r2==> r0 = r0+r2
> 13c: rts
>
> since the required values are already in r0,r1,r2.
We'd need to know what processor this is, and what optimization options
you used.
> PS: I am using gcc-3.3
That's very bad. Even if there is a bug in that compiler, it's
so very old that it's unlikely to be fixed.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Passing arguments of function through registers
[not found] ` <499165AF.6090503@redpinesignals.com>
@ 2009-02-10 11:54 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2009-02-10 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sumanth; +Cc: gcc-help
sumanth wrote:
> I am running with -Os level optimization level.
> For the time being assume the processor is arm processor .
OK. Current gcc (4.4 pre) does this with -Os:
00000000 <add>:
0: e0811000 add r1, r1, r0
4: e0810002 add r0, r1, r2
8: e12fff1e bx lr
> Guess I can resolve this with gcc-3.3 itself.
Maybe. I'm quite surprised that any version of gcc generated code
as bad as what you posted.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-10 11:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-10 11:21 Passing arguments of function through registers sumanth
2009-02-10 11:28 ` Andrew Haley
[not found] ` <499165AF.6090503@redpinesignals.com>
2009-02-10 11:54 ` Andrew Haley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).