From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-37709-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7125 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2009 12:59:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 7115 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jul 2009 12:59:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mta-out.inet.fi (HELO kirsi1.inet.fi) (195.156.147.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:59:14 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.42] (88.192.88.204) by kirsi1.inet.fi (8.5.014)         id 49F6055A02CD9CEF for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:59:11 +0300
Message-ID: <4A5F24F5.8040902@wippies.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:59:00 -0000
From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@wippies.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Slow build
References: <20090715205647.A882271813@saratoga.rkirkpat.net> <4A5F1776.8010704@onetel.net> <4A5F23D6.1030103@wippies.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A5F23D6.1030103@wippies.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2

Kai Ruottu wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> 
>> This was for the 'gcc-4.4.1-RC-20090715' snapshot, which I'm going to 
>> test, but I doubt gcc 4.4.0 would be too different.
> 
> Maybe someone could define what the "build gcc" means here... Even in a
> slow 550 MHz P-III PC with Fedora 8 the GCC build for C and C++ took
> only 1 h 17 minutes...

I forgot to tell that I tried the gcc-4.4-20090714 snapshots for a
32-bit Linux/x86 target (not the $build & $host). Single build for
'gcc', 'libgcc', 'libstdc++' etc.