From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10919 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2010 13:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10911 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2010 13:16:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exprod6og110.obsmtp.com (HELO exprod6og110.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:16:52 +0000 Received: from source ([192.150.8.22]) by exprod6ob110.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKS5ebwBu2XLa5l/vnO5onKToU5PahwNfa@postini.com; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:52 PST Received: from inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.52]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o2ADGes5020819; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o2ADGe06003723; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:40 -0800 From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Garc=EDa_Pallero?= CC: "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:16:00 -0000 Subject: RE: -fdefault-integer-8 in c Message-ID: <4B7A6CC9992C4E4FB188D02872C90A6B134F24@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> References: <323eda51003091441l1c6292a2t66a737ae57833751@mail.gmail.com> <4B7A6CC9992C4E4FB188D02872C90A6B134F1F@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>,<323eda51003100436x21d8c5fam9108bd9a44d8fde1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <323eda51003100436x21d8c5fam9108bd9a44d8fde1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 Hi Jos=E9, > Yes, if I use typedef I would to replace the definition in all my code an= d it would be dangerous. 's int64_t is int64_t on all platforms which have a 64-bit intege= r type, for C. I'm not seeing the dangerousness. Unless you mean C++, which does not have= int64_t (except by the C++ compilers which have added it as an extension, = or added it in anticipation of C++0x). Sincerely, --Eljay