From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1626 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2011 17:32:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1606 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2011 17:32:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:32:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RHWGmQ024842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:32:16 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0RHWGtF008218; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:32:16 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.25] (ovpn-113-25.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.25]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0RHWEPh020509; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:32:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4D41AC1E.1090006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:32:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kevin diggs CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc 4.x object compatibility References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/11 09:26, kevin diggs wrote: > Hi, > > One idea I had to try to figure out why I can't boot a non-SMP kernel > on PowerPC when compiled with gcc 4.2.4 or 4.3.5 is to start with a > 4.1.2 built tree and rebuild select parts with one of the newer > compilers and see if the result will boot. Is there any chance that > can work? It should and if it doesn't we'd certainly want to know about it. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNQawdAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7cxUIALO7dUrag5nTM+kfOM2ufI2V RKBPQ4FZfFOewMch66/Pj9lSFvJfNlKKSN9mTfoKcX0pSNTxbz2lz7gyJfe/BDlt PsSkpvSAN37NLR5ih7uScRAB2o+gK+OQvGlG351EX5uLRVUx2q1s+2j/34H2pKXi U87uauZIkbqRZn+VrOJZpw+fCYroAjar63/QQf+QFMVoxklSEV7094jpC8fW1VWK FZAEqsHWKfCQ7ffpIFsNDUuTxlMNV+m3QNg7NSzRZmwlsh9zzZMSpA3kK6vf/RQ3 wngRmF0D0k8lPSgJD9armBdgWxbJzGetgc7B+HSyd6/ayP27aVc1FFoilRu6kbY= =jjvv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----