From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-44945-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23496 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2011 02:17:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 23486 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2011 02:17:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,TW_SG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:17:11 +0000
Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so2919237bwz.20        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.73.206 with SMTP id r14mr406072bkj.181.1300414629009;        Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([89.187.142.208])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm1791802bka.15.2011.03.17.19.17.02        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D82C091.1060009@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:17:00 -0000
From: Michael Zintakis <michael.zintakis@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com>
CC: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>,  "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
Subject: Re: error: conflicting types for 'psignal'
References: <4D829D65.2060803@googlemail.com>	<mcrzkotkxxi.fsf@google.com>	<4D82BB8F.4060902@googlemail.com> <AANLkTi=q9+6-acgU9uuj3c_r6r4-2FCvaDf=5RwqsNaK@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=q9+6-acgU9uuj3c_r6r4-2FCvaDf=5RwqsNaK@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2


> I'm sure Yann can give a better explanation, but we decided to stop
> moving patches to newer versions of source components in crosstool-ng
> until we can verify the patches with upstream maintainers.
>   
I posted a couple of (very) detailed messages regarding my ongoing 
experience with crosstool-ng to the crossgcc mailing list (problems, bug 
fixes as well as questions and ideas), so I am sure when Yann or anyone 
else interested in this will pick them up in due course.

> I guess this would be a great time to ask if we can get this patch
> merged upstream or at least check the validity of the patch with Ian.
>
> Either way, thanks for testing the patch. Please let us know how the build goes.
>   
Building (with the new patch) is running at present (about 25+ minutes 
to go I reckon), so will post the result. If it fails I may as well 
downgrade the binutils to version 2.20.1 because there are quite a few 
patches there and I think I might have better luck. I did quite a lot of 
modifications to the whole process though, but this is not the thread 
for it - when I am done I will post the details on the crossgcc mailing 
list. Fingers crossed...