From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2333 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2012 15:25:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 2316 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2012 15:25:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:25:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q03FOx8R020807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:24:59 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-30.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.30]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q03FOwpo008915; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:24:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4F031DCA.1040709@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:25:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Questions before submitting a bug report References: <4F031966.1040205@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On 01/03/2012 03:23 PM, Markus Henschel wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On >> Behalf Of Andrew Haley >> Sent: Dienstag, 3. Januar 2012 16:06 >> To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: Questions before submitting a bug report >> >> On 01/03/2012 03:02 PM, Markus Henschel wrote: >>> struct Foo * foo_instance() >>> { >>> static struct Foo foo; >>> return &foo; >>> } >> >> Uh, no. You can't return a reference to a local variable. > > But it's a static variable. My apologies. I posted too soon. Andrew.