From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=pECQ=6K=xry111.site=xry111@sourceware.org>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C6603858D35
	for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:43:28 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7C6603858D35
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site;
	s=default; t=1676378607;
	bh=yIJtIXu3Z1VqLAa0QbGiVZtr7e27La/6WVimAY2gf7s=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TkLi3obCUibG65V0/iwFLtK0ZdJFtyvRYhiI63cPqo3Oy8R5Pe2qkBFJbFzTfGHA6
	 O5MQ+qHvJH5vc9z7akt7yWsXaze7v7wwUNgKHl00TaJOqmyTP8tYyRgJk5qgnUKwPt
	 MronbX7BoIoMp4A9onDl/9h91ZSL30hbVDnVm8gE=
Received: from [IPv6:240e:456:1030:5cf6:bedf:6bc:7e29:f3e5] (unknown [IPv6:240e:456:1030:5cf6:bedf:6bc:7e29:f3e5])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	(Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
	by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEC9C65EFC;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2023 07:43:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4db1fdb33d0f4006e0b083b4429949337a740c01.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: Cross Compiling for riscv64
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Sagar Acharya <sagaracharya@tutanota.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 20:43:18 +0800
In-Reply-To: <NOEtZxw--3-9@tutanota.com>
References: <NOEhh6P--3-9@tutanota.com>
	 <8db704d6dae26764592f794835e07fc4100ed506.camel@xry111.site>
	 <NOEtZxw--3-9@tutanota.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>

On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 13:28 +0100, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> The real question is, whether building a compiler should require 900MB
> memory?
>=20
> And my answer to it is a clear undisputed no. 900MB is more than
> enough memory for building a compiler.

GCC is a real compiler, not an example in the compiler textbook.

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University