public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
To: Alexey Salmin <alexey.salmin@gmail.com>
Cc: dclarke@blastwave.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, aph@redhat.com,
	 david.kirkby@onetel.net, ams@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why is gcc going to default to "GNU dialect of ISO C99?"
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52552.10.0.66.17.1265896832.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org> (raw)


> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
> wrote:
>>
>>> It all reminds me a story when I won a bottle of beer from my
>>> scientific adviser back in 2005. We had a bet: will gcc compile this
>>> code:
>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>>  int main() {
>>>   printf("a");
>>>   int a;
>>>   printf("b");
>>>   return 0;
>>> }
>>> He was so sure that gcc won't allow it that didn't ever tried :) Thus,
>>> I think gnu extensions by default are not so bad :)
>>>
>>> Alexey
>>
>> Let's have a look at that. I don't see any issues really. You call
>> printf() with a literal string, then define some simple integer, then
>> print another literal string with a call to printf() and finally return
>> back to the calling process with a status of 0. Very nice.
>>
<snip>
>
> 334 lines of research for 7 lines of code :)
>
> Alexey

Here are 7 more :-)

$ lint -v -Nlevel=4 -Xc99=all sample1.c

variable unused in function
    (9) a in main

function returns value which is always ignored
    printf


-- 
Dennis Clarke
dclarke@opensolaris.ca  <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dclarke@blastwave.org   <- Email related to open source for Solaris


             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11 14:14 Dennis Clarke [this message]
2010-02-11 14:42 ` Alexey Salmin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-11 17:14 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 14:50 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 13:44 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 14:00 ` Alexey Salmin
2010-02-11  2:40 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11  9:43 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2010-02-11 12:00   ` Alexey Salmin
     [not found]     ` <C79952E6.1947E%eljay@adobe.com>
2010-02-11 13:48       ` Alexey Salmin
     [not found]         ` <C79973C1.194A3%eljay@adobe.com>
2010-02-11 14:58           ` Alexey Salmin
2010-02-11 15:11             ` John (Eljay) Love-Jensen
2010-02-12  5:32     ` Patrick Horgan
2010-02-10 17:00 Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 17:26 ` Andrew Haley
2010-02-10 17:45   ` Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 18:07     ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2010-02-10 19:25       ` Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 20:59         ` Kevin P. Fleming
2010-02-10 18:39     ` Andrew Haley
2010-02-11  2:46     ` Ian Lance Taylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52552.10.0.66.17.1265896832.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org \
    --to=dclarke@blastwave.org \
    --cc=alexey.salmin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ams@gnu.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.kirkby@onetel.net \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).