From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
To: Alexey Salmin <alexey.salmin@gmail.com>
Cc: dclarke@blastwave.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, aph@redhat.com,
david.kirkby@onetel.net, ams@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why is gcc going to default to "GNU dialect of ISO C99?"
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52552.10.0.66.17.1265896832.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org> (raw)
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
> wrote:
>>
>>> It all reminds me a story when I won a bottle of beer from my
>>> scientific adviser back in 2005. We had a bet: will gcc compile this
>>> code:
>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>> Â int main() {
>>> Â printf("a");
>>> Â int a;
>>> Â printf("b");
>>> Â return 0;
>>> }
>>> He was so sure that gcc won't allow it that didn't ever tried :) Thus,
>>> I think gnu extensions by default are not so bad :)
>>>
>>> Alexey
>>
>> Let's have a look at that. I don't see any issues really. You call
>> printf() with a literal string, then define some simple integer, then
>> print another literal string with a call to printf() and finally return
>> back to the calling process with a status of 0. Very nice.
>>
<snip>
>
> 334 lines of research for 7 lines of code :)
>
> Alexey
Here are 7 more :-)
$ lint -v -Nlevel=4 -Xc99=all sample1.c
variable unused in function
(9) a in main
function returns value which is always ignored
printf
--
Dennis Clarke
dclarke@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dclarke@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 14:14 Dennis Clarke [this message]
2010-02-11 14:42 ` Alexey Salmin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-11 17:14 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 14:50 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 13:44 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 14:00 ` Alexey Salmin
2010-02-11 2:40 Dennis Clarke
2010-02-11 9:43 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2010-02-11 12:00 ` Alexey Salmin
[not found] ` <C79952E6.1947E%eljay@adobe.com>
2010-02-11 13:48 ` Alexey Salmin
[not found] ` <C79973C1.194A3%eljay@adobe.com>
2010-02-11 14:58 ` Alexey Salmin
2010-02-11 15:11 ` John (Eljay) Love-Jensen
2010-02-12 5:32 ` Patrick Horgan
2010-02-10 17:00 Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 17:26 ` Andrew Haley
2010-02-10 17:45 ` Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 18:07 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2010-02-10 19:25 ` Dr. David Kirkby
2010-02-10 20:59 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2010-02-10 18:39 ` Andrew Haley
2010-02-11 2:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52552.10.0.66.17.1265896832.squirrel@interact.purplecow.org \
--to=dclarke@blastwave.org \
--cc=alexey.salmin@gmail.com \
--cc=ams@gnu.org \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=david.kirkby@onetel.net \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).