From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-54446-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29658 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2013 15:17:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29642 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2013 15:17:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:17:38 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rARFHUAW005474	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:17:30 -0500
Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-176.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.176])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rARFHTT7025885;	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:17:29 -0500
Message-ID: <52960D08.7000901@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:10:00 -0000
From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131028 Thunderbird/17.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Johannes Lorenz <johannes89@mailueberfall.de>
CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@wippies.com>
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: How to compile gcc toolchain with special sysroot correctly?
References: <trinity-b0175885-2659-4e20-85f2-2f0486409b2b-1385560673943@3capp-gmx-bs06>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-b0175885-2659-4e20-85f2-2f0486409b2b-1385560673943@3capp-gmx-bs06>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2

On 11/27/2013 01:57 PM, Johannes Lorenz wrote:

> So you'd say, unlike Andrew, that I should not compile a new
> glibc. I need a new libstdc++, I hope this will be compatible with
> the old glibc.

I expect so.

> But if I really want to compile a new glibc, you think this is
> impossible/very difficult?

I didn't say that you should compile a new glibc.  I assumed that was
your goal.  It is an eccentric thing to be doing.

Andrew.