From: "Uday P. Khedker" <uday@cse.iitb.ac.in>
To: Sandeep K Chaudhary <babbusandy2006@gmail.com>,
David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GIMPLE pass - Assignment evaluation
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 06:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AFF1FD.9010003@cse.iitb.ac.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEEAEzUJfFC50=e49UPD6xW-pSozrhCUv5HJaD4yKd=b9rfshg@mail.gmail.com>
You may also want to go through the slides at http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/gcc-workshop-13/index.php?page=slides.
In particular, http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/gcc-workshop-13/downloads/slides/Day1/gccw13-gimple-manipulation.pdf and http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/gcc-workshop-13/downloads/slides/Day2/gccw13-code-view.pdf may be of help.
Unfortunately there is some problem with playing the videos of the lectures (http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/grc/gcc-workshop-12/index.php?page=videos) but we are working on that.
Uday Khedker.
Sandeep K Chaudhary wrote, On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:54 AM:
> Thank you so much for the reply, David !
>
> I am not sure where exactly my pass gets invoked. I will try to find it.
> But the pass get invoked somewhere in the GIMPLE stage as shown in the
> GCC architecture[1].
> How is it that one can dictate where the pass can be invoked? Can you
> please provide some pointers/links about this?
>
> But looking at the GCC architecture[1], I can see that the
> optimization passes come into picture only after GIMPLE and SSA stage.
> I dumped the IR and other related files using -fdump-tree-all with
> optimization flag -O1, and saw that the assignments have not been
> evaluated for test.c.004t.gimple as well as test.c.018t.ssa.
>
> Also, in test.c.025t.forwprop1 and test.c.029t.copyprop1, they totally
> get rid of everything in the assignments i.e. they only have the final
> evaluation of the variables which is not what I want as I need
> evaluation for individual statements.
>
> [2] provides a nice diagrammatic understanding of the relative
> invocations of GCC opt passes. It is quite helpful for understanding
> the relative positions of the passes.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sandeep.
>
> [1] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_C_Compiler_Internals/GNU_C_Compiler_Architecture
> [2] https://gcc-python-plugin.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tables-of-passes.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-17 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 21:10 Sandeep K Chaudhary
2013-12-17 1:33 ` David Malcolm
2013-12-17 6:24 ` Sandeep K Chaudhary
2013-12-17 6:41 ` Uday P. Khedker [this message]
2013-12-17 7:26 ` Sandeep K Chaudhary
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-09 23:05 Sandeep K Chaudhary
2013-07-02 3:24 Sandeep K Chaudhary
2013-07-02 5:44 ` Marc Glisse
2013-07-02 17:09 ` Sandeep K Chaudhary
2013-07-10 8:18 ` Sandeep K Chaudhary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AFF1FD.9010003@cse.iitb.ac.in \
--to=uday@cse.iitb.ac.in \
--cc=babbusandy2006@gmail.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).