From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10495 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2014 17:48:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10443 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2014 17:48:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:48:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s84Hm7b4021530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:48:07 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink ([10.3.113.10]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s84Hm5o2011930; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:48:06 -0400 Message-ID: <5408A5D5.90601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Webber CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: is portable aliasing possible in C++? References: <5408988E.2060301@redhat.com> <5408A015.5040106@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 On 09/04/2014 06:44 PM, Andy Webber wrote: > Know of any way to ask Jason Merrill or Richard Biener to weigh in? > They seem to be very knowledgable in this area. They should be. Drop them an email, with a pointer to the thread: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-09/msg00030.html