From: Maurizio Vitale <maurizio.vitale@polymath-solutions.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: aligned attribute
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F3398C-978D-4471-802E-D14D4B777BEB@polymath-solutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17801.15520.429722.620134@zebedee.pink>
Thanks. Now to add to my confusion, on my system __alignof(long
double) returns 16, which I presume means that all allocation,
static, dynamic and automatic for long double objects are 16 byte
aligned.
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Maurizio Vitale writes:
>> But when I move to my real application (an event-driven simulator) I
>> get stack allocated objects on 8-byte boundaries.
>>
>> Now, my reading of the documentation is that the aligned attribute
>> (when used for types, as in the example I gave) applies to all
>> allocations (global, auto and heap). Is there any place where it is
>> said otherwise? Regardless of the documentation, what does the
>> implementation do?
>
> You can't get alignment any greater than the alignment of the stack
> pointer. The alignment of the stack pointer is defined the the ABI of
> the particular target you're using. I think it's 16 for x86
> processors, but the processor itself doesn't enforce that: it varies
> across operating systems and processor variants.
>
>> This lead me to believe that every time a variable of type S is
>> allocated, the requested alignment is used (modulo linker
>> limitations of above).
>
> Sure, but that only really applies to statically allocated objects. I
> guess no-one appreciated that someone might want to use it for
> auto variables.
>
> Andrew.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 13:28 Maurizio Vitale
2006-12-20 13:37 ` Andrew Haley
2006-12-20 13:52 ` Maurizio Vitale [this message]
2006-12-21 21:23 ` Tim Prince
2006-12-21 21:31 ` Maurizio Vitale
2006-12-22 12:02 ` Andrew Haley
2006-12-22 13:16 ` Maurizio Vitale
2006-12-21 21:21 ` Tim Prince
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F3398C-978D-4471-802E-D14D4B777BEB@polymath-solutions.com \
--to=maurizio.vitale@polymath-solutions.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).