From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2007 01:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22183 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2007 01:15:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from secure.latencyzero.com (HELO mail.latencyzero.com) (64.71.153.217) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:14:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 2493 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2007 01:14:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rmann1.internal.xbow.com) (rmann@63.64.55.212) by 0 with ESMTPA; 18 Dec 2007 01:14:55 -0000 Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Message-Id: <5850CA22-6BB2-4ED9-AF36-0EB227F70F4E@latencyzero.com> From: Rick Mann To: NightStrike In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: More info: Binary built on different platforms with exact same tools different? Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:15:00 -0000 References: <5A2671EC-48B9-4492-A1E1-F346CE6811CC@latencyzero.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:11 PM, NightStrike wrote: > Ah, you are cross compiling. I misunderstood. So on both platforms, > you are building a cross compiler, gcc 4.2 You are then using that > cross compiler that you build on each platform to build your program, > and the resulting executable is different. Ding! Sorry for being unclear. > Hmm.... Interesting scenario. Heh. Yeah. -- Rick