From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10323 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 13:36:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10245 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 13:35:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net) (194.217.242.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 13:35:59 -0000 Received: from mailgate.softwire.co.uk ([62.49.203.138] helo=polarbear) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16zdz2-0006Dm-0V; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:35:56 +0100 From: "Rupert Wood" To: "'Thomas J Amato'" Cc: Subject: RE: Help with namespaces bug GCC 3.0.3.... Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18D120088@whale.softwire.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18D5DD1FC@whale.softwire.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 Thomas J Amato wrote: > I was wondering if someone could tell me why this code > fragment fails to compile under 3.0.3 (Solaris 2.7). I can't reproduce this. Compiling the header on its own: g++ -Wall -c -x c++ new.hxx parses the file OK without warnings using v2.95.3 (and development v3.1+) on Solaris 2.8 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) and using v3.0.3 on HP/UX 11.00 (hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00). I can't imagine that it's anything Solaris 2.7 specific. Are you sure that the including code is OK? Sorry that's not much help! Rup.