From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12110 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 11:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12103 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 11:10:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net) (194.217.242.89) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 11:10:33 -0000 Received: from mailgate.softwire.co.uk ([62.49.203.138] helo=GRIZZLYBEAR) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18gNRo-000Mse-0V; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:10:32 +0000 From: "Rupert Wood" To: "'Huw Lynes'" Cc: Subject: RE: Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ? Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18D5EC7CF@whale.softwire.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DA270C8@whale.softwire.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 Huw, > For legacy reasons I need to build a copy of gcc2.95.2 on a > RedHat7.2 box (glibc 2.2.4-29). It falls over during the compile. > Having done a bit of googling I find mention of a patch for > gcc2.95.2 to make it compatible with glibc2.2 I don't have the patch, sorry, but a few quick thoughts: * doesn't RedHat 7.x have gcc 2.95.x installed as kgcc? I don't think the original gcc 2.96 could build the Linux kernel * the patch probably found its way into gcc 2.95.3 or the the gcc 2.95.4 prerelease in CVS (not obviously marked in the changelog, though) - you could try one of those instead. Good luck, Rup.