public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gcc -C acts different between 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2
@ 1999-11-22  9:52 kevin_collins
  1999-11-30 23:28 ` kevin_collins
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kevin_collins @ 1999-11-22  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: help-gcc

I am reposting this with more information. Any help would be
appreciated.

We are seeing different output when using 'gcc -E -C -P -undef' on the
same file with gcc versions 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2. Here is an example
illustrating the difference.

Source (xxx.c) :
--
#define   XYZ_ABC  /* Define XYZ_ABC */

#ifdef ABC_XYZ  /* ifdef ABC_XYZ */
#define ABC_XYZ_DEFINED
#endif  /* endif ABC_XYZ */

main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

2.7.2.2 output:
--
# gcc -E -C -P -undef xxx.c




main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

2.95.2 output:
--
# gcc -E -C -P -undef xxx.c

/* Define XYZ_ABC */

/* ifdef ABC_XYZ *//* endif ABC_XYZ */

main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

So the question is - which of these behaviors is correct? We are using
gcc to parse files that are NOT C source and thus '/* */' structures for
comments are invalid. However, because we only want the pre-processor to
handle the directives, we don't want it to get rid of anything because
it "thinks" its a C comment.

Comments?

Thanks,

Kevin


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* gcc -C acts different between 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2
  1999-11-22  9:52 gcc -C acts different between 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2 kevin_collins
@ 1999-11-30 23:28 ` kevin_collins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kevin_collins @ 1999-11-30 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: help-gcc

I am reposting this with more information. Any help would be
appreciated.

We are seeing different output when using 'gcc -E -C -P -undef' on the
same file with gcc versions 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2. Here is an example
illustrating the difference.

Source (xxx.c) :
--
#define   XYZ_ABC  /* Define XYZ_ABC */

#ifdef ABC_XYZ  /* ifdef ABC_XYZ */
#define ABC_XYZ_DEFINED
#endif  /* endif ABC_XYZ */

main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

2.7.2.2 output:
--
# gcc -E -C -P -undef xxx.c




main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

2.95.2 output:
--
# gcc -E -C -P -undef xxx.c

/* Define XYZ_ABC */

/* ifdef ABC_XYZ *//* endif ABC_XYZ */

main()
{
        printf ("this is a string\n");  /* printf */
        /* comment only here */
}
--

So the question is - which of these behaviors is correct? We are using
gcc to parse files that are NOT C source and thus '/* */' structures for
comments are invalid. However, because we only want the pre-processor to
handle the directives, we don't want it to get rid of anything because
it "thinks" its a C comment.

Comments?

Thanks,

Kevin


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1999-11-30 23:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-11-22  9:52 gcc -C acts different between 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.2 kevin_collins
1999-11-30 23:28 ` kevin_collins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).