From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=rHRi=67=xry111.site=xry111@sourceware.org>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A9F3858D39
	for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue,  7 Mar 2023 05:20:36 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E3A9F3858D39
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site;
	s=default; t=1678166434;
	bh=oA064leTZLh3/5ZzAMgkdlmjYYXhwvP1mpu6vD9Hg7I=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NkguR0qnQYnSzmXxY8JhOfa2TD4sKNz7o7JM/Ph6sgL+ydXiCwBjv7nUon/WWkOBU
	 h9UluvMIJam1R8ZVZJX/th8lvbnMncZRE0UxLpsDx14UFjIM79OFTSxEgCwPS16q5p
	 bKqcFYreJ3GIbkzVuyRG1NCHSQ8Ow6dgkntrepoY=
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	(Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
	by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C13A65EB6;
	Tue,  7 Mar 2023 00:20:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <8214a50e7b25e9392c75bfb5a83a46e86b9216c2.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [NEED HELP][GCOV] uncoverage virtual destructor
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Nhu Vo <nhu.vo.eb@renesas.com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>, Chan Le <chan.le.ry@renesas.com>, Vu
 Phan <vu.phan.uj@renesas.com>, Viet Ngo <viet.ngo.xw@renesas.com>, Duc La
 <duc.la.xf@renesas.com>, Duy Pham <duy.pham.xw@renesas.com>, Dinh Thanh
 Truc <truc.dinh-thanh@banvien.com.vn>, Sy Nguyen Duc
 <sy.nguyen-duc@banvien.com.vn>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 13:20:31 +0800
In-Reply-To: <TYCPR01MB94668FBD9D4BBD05065631CAA5B79@TYCPR01MB9466.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: 
	<PUZPR03MB7136C0DF6F9E38E7454501D38FB29@PUZPR03MB7136.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
	 <CAH6eHdTm6yupGxi4fRk7bPapxucRw-_fbD_p=6geWHkZYKe9ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <PUZPR03MB71369CDE702937C466ED6DFB8FB39@PUZPR03MB7136.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
	 <CAH6eHdTKBoX5GGSEEVURYKdhpcfq5NzJQHVtdwA-B4BrkHj5SA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <PUZPR03MB713684F987934D30354065FD8FB39@PUZPR03MB7136.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
	 <e3202671f77ff757f7806ba48f651d0255435133.camel@xry111.site>
	 <TYCPR01MB94668FBD9D4BBD05065631CAA5B79@TYCPR01MB9466.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>

On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 05:18 +0000, Nhu Vo wrote:
> According to your explanation about D0, D1, D2, we have some questions
> as follows:
> =C2=A0
> 1. We understood that D0 will call D1, D1 will call D2, is it correct?
> (as image below)

It's implementation defined, D0 can either call D1 or inline D1 (i. e.
perform the action of D1 itself).

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University