RE: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

RE: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

[Yu kenny-a18604]

I am curious about demangling and remangling way. Could anyone show me the process? Or give me relevant document cause I've never know of it before.

Thanks in advance,

Kenny

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Sidwell [mailto:nathan@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:44 PM
To: Alexander Stock
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling


Alexander Stock wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I want to convert a with Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 created dll with
> "Microsoft C++ name mangling" to a dll with "GCC C++ name mangling"
> and I want to ask if it's generally possible to do such a task?
> Can I only demangle the Microsoft C++ names and then mangle them with
> GNU C++ style again or have I to watch some other obscure things?
Your scheme should work, provided no information has been lost in the MSVC++
mangling. (It is possible some template information is lost, such that
there are two possible g++ remanglings. I suspect that will not be a problem
in practice.)

I'm sure you're aware that you won't be able to pass class objects across the
library interface.

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
          The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org


I

Re: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

[Ricardo Anguiano]

Yu kenny-a18604 <kenny.yu@motorola.com> writes:

> I am curious about demangling and remangling way. Could anyone show
> me the process? Or give me relevant document cause I've never know
> of it before.

http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html#mangling

-- 
Ricardo Anguiano
http://www.codesourcery.com

RE: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

[Yu kenny-a18604]

Hi, Alex:

I wonder how you'd like to align MSVS mangled name to GCC one. I feel it tricky. Any tools you will have?

Best regards,

Kenny

-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Anguiano [mailto:anguiano@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:32 PM
To: Yu kenny-a18604
Cc: 'Nathan Sidwell'; Alexander Stock; gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling


Yu kenny-a18604 <kenny.yu@motorola.com> writes:

> I am curious about demangling and remangling way. Could anyone show
> me the process? Or give me relevant document cause I've never know
> of it before.

http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html#mangling

-- 
Ricardo Anguiano
http://www.codesourcery.com

Re: Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

[Nathan Sidwell]

Alexander Stock wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I want to convert a with Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 created dll with
> "Microsoft C++ name mangling" to a dll with "GCC C++ name mangling"
> and I want to ask if it's generally possible to do such a task?
> Can I only demangle the Microsoft C++ names and then mangle them with
> GNU C++ style again or have I to watch some other obscure things?
Your scheme should work, provided no information has been lost in the MSVC++
mangling. (It is possible some template information is lost, such that
there are two possible g++ remanglings. I suspect that will not be a problem
in practice.)

I'm sure you're aware that you won't be able to pass class objects across the
library interface.

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
          The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org

Convert MS VC++ name mangling to GCC name mangling

[Alexander Stock]

Hello,

I want to convert a with Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 created dll with
"Microsoft C++ name mangling" to a dll with "GCC C++ name mangling"
and I want to ask if it's generally possible to do such a task?
Can I only demangle the Microsoft C++ names and then mangle them with
GNU C++ style again or have I to watch some other obscure things?

Thanks in advance,
Alexander Stock