From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=ErTN=JS=gentoo.org=sam@sourceware.org>
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F53858C53
	for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri,  9 Feb 2024 07:42:24 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BF2F53858C53
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BF2F53858C53
Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=140.211.166.183
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707464546; cv=none;
	b=FcDbmzwB9L6W8uSSHtYwVt4uJt70+8FPBHOOlu+AZmLBuAM725bRXOclnXhP3IY2MTbXnAijuVJ3c89El23IcqQZLnSyfB4In/gNOBBMrJ7ESiUkVkLWITdxLOnKRxzAcM6U9d18sspsRWe+qgpFp3QDvgrHNL2PBVXiBWOmqbI=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1707464546; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=oGnwsEfM0gfimdzzxGy5G6LeO2IKwSEmq9iX6oXQVFE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=HLn91Jyf62qZiiLORmPtud3jvPaksVtIeHFvxMb4d4ujZ5rRism99Zpb8Gk9jW2zinby0Q5ANzbcTFfBnk04XnIeDdzz9ocKkZWNYzeLbJigQ0/ReksXQ+Hew/hAoHW7xhnZoK3ppuxAeeC5UI5Yaj9asS1bEwceoXVfx+UnF1o=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
References: <CAMtd7J6T9HicddjpyhMxWtL0pbKPqrS_AtyTDLY4=YMgAFckCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.8; emacs 30.0.50
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: Deepthi H <deepadeepthi98@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Sanitizer CHECK failed: sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:133
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:42:05 +0000
Organization: Gentoo
In-reply-to: <CAMtd7J6T9HicddjpyhMxWtL0pbKPqrS_AtyTDLY4=YMgAFckCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <875xyyt76u.fsf@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>


Deepthi H via Gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I am facing the issue on enabling sanitizers for gcc on aarch64 linux.
> The issue was observed with the following command :-
> "aarch64-poky-linux-gcc -O1 -fsanitize=3Daddress -fno-omit-frame-pointer =
-o
> test test.c"
>
> *AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:131
> "((kSpaceBeg)) =3D=3D ((address_range.Init(TotalSpaceSize,
> PrimaryAllocatorName, kSpaceBeg)))" (0x600000000000, 0xfffffffffffffff4)
> (tid=3D389)    <empty stack>*
>
> I found a patch that fixes the sanitizer issue for arm64  on llvm :-
> =E2=9A=99D60243 [LSan][AArch64] Speed-up leak and address sanitizers on A=
Arch64 for
> 48-bit VMA (llvm.org) <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60243#change-1yIlOwF0zl2=
Y>

That should've been synced into GCC ages ago. What version of GCC are
you using?

>
> I analyzed and tried to port the patch that fixes the issue for llvm. Aft=
er
> backporting the LLVM patches to the GCC sources, I encountered several
> build errors, particularly related to the AddressSanitizer (ASan) and
> LeakSanitizer (LSan) libraries. I have fixed lsan and asan issues. However
> sanitizer_common is completely different in gcc than llvm.
> Can you please help me fix this issue on gcc sources or is than any other
> way to fix this issue.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Deepthi