public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: "Claudio Bley" <bley@cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
Cc: "Joshua Nye" <josh@boxcarmedia.com>,
	 "Steve Dondley" <s@dondley.com>, <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding "assignment from incompatible pointer type" warning
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hefguj01.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15795.58223.521979.895246@wh2-19.st.uni-magdeburg.de> ("Claudio Bley"'s message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:22:23 +0200")

"Claudio Bley" <bley@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> writes:

>     >>  What do you consider legal and why wouldn't it be?
>
>     Florian> Casting a pointer from float to int can result in
>     Florian> undefined behavior on some implementations.
>
> I can't see why. Can you elaborate on that?

Well, it's all in the standard, although it's a bit scattered.

> I mean, casting on the machine code level does just nothing - it's
> just "syntactic sugar" to convince the compiler to be quiet.

It's not.  In C, pointers are NOT machine addresses.  Pointers are an
abstract concept, and often, something which would work if they were
machine addresses, fails miserably.  For example, even if two pointers
compare equal (because they point to the same object), it's possible
that an operation on one of the two is undefined, while it is defined
for the other one.

> I think casting from one pointer type to another does no harm at
> all. Am I wrong?

Yes, you are, I'm afraid.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-21 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-13  9:08 Steve Dondley
2002-10-13  9:28 ` Joshua Nye
2002-10-13  9:34   ` Steve Dondley
2002-10-13 15:09   ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-13 15:19     ` Joshua Nye
2002-10-15 11:24     ` Joshua Nye
2002-10-21  3:12       ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-21  4:22         ` Claudio Bley
2002-10-21  4:30           ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2002-10-21  6:48             ` Claudio Bley
2002-10-21  4:42           ` Sebastian Huber
2002-10-21  6:43           ` John Love-Jensen
2002-10-21  6:52             ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-13 13:37 Moore, Mathew L
2002-10-13 15:10 ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-21  6:07 Moore, Mathew L
2002-10-21  7:04 Moore, Mathew L
2002-10-21  7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2002-10-21  7:43   ` John Love-Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hefguj01.fsf@deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=bley@cs.uni-magdeburg.de \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=josh@boxcarmedia.com \
    --cc=s@dondley.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).