From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fweimer@redhat.com>
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313FE3858436
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:42:56 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 313FE3858436
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-413-gVq6wUvSO4ervIs3HU1hOQ-1; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:42:54 -0400
X-MC-Unique: gVq6wUvSO4ervIs3HU1hOQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A314E1006AA0;
 Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.195.4])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0885C25A;
 Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: "HON LUU" <hon@dreambigsemi.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,  "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org"
 <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: gcc question
References: <DB6PR02MB3111B61150346E2A307E4B13DDD49@DB6PR02MB3111.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <20210908162025.GO1583@gate.crashing.org>
 <VI1PR02MB3118A7AB65F2BEE424C90E3FDDD49@VI1PR02MB3118.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <VI1PR02MB3118DC8140A67A7C0E99BEE0DDD49@VI1PR02MB3118.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <VI1PR02MB3118EECC1B59AAF07E8A0E45DDD69@VI1PR02MB3118.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <20210910183609.GA1583@gate.crashing.org>
 <DB6PR02MB3111AB3D949B72434D4E414EDDD79@DB6PR02MB3111.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <87wnnk7020.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <VI1PR02MB31187F8FA0230724550E78F2DDD99@VI1PR02MB3118.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 21:42:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR02MB31187F8FA0230724550E78F2DDD99@VI1PR02MB3118.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 (HON LUU's message of "Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:40:53 +0000")
Message-ID: <87pmtc6z46.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:42:57 -0000

* HON LUU:

> Yes, understood the point. I would have to "not using -fPIC" if I
> could not found any way out.  Anyway if I willing to change the asm
> function to change the constraint to something different from "i"
> (immediate), I wonder if the question is still proper.

Are you building userspace code or kernel code?  Why do you end up
compiling arch_static_branch?

Thanks,
Florian