From: Harald van Dijk <harald@gigawatt.nl>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Inline assembly and value extensions
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:30:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8985cc81-573c-b011-4e02-aa9829524133@gigawatt.nl> (raw)
Hi,
I am trying to port some x86-64 inline assembly to work properly for the
x32 ABI and I am running into a small problem. The x32 ABI specifies
that pointers are passed and returned zero-extended to 64 bits. When a
pointer variable is defined by an inline assembly statement and then
returned by a function, I do not see a way to inform GCC that the result
is already zero-extended, that GCC does not need to zero-extend it again.
A silly example:
void *return_a_pointer(void) {
void *result;
asm("movl $0x11223344, %%eax" : "=a"(result));
return result;
}
This function gets an extra "movl %eax, %eax" between the hand-written
movl and the generated ret, which can be seen online at
<https://godbolt.org/z/T8bGPo>. This extra movl is there to ensure the
high bits of %rax are zero, but the initial movl already achieves that.
How can I inform GCC that it does not need to emit that extra movl?
Likewise, is there an easy way to provide an inline assembly statement
with a zero-extended pointer input? This one I am able to work around,
as it is possible to instead of passing in a pointer value p, pass in an
integer value (uint64_t)(uint32_t)p, but the workaround is kind of hard
to read and I would like to avoid that if possible.
I looked the documentation for either relevant inline assembly
constraints or relevant variable / type attributes, but was unable to
find any. The most promising search result was the mode attribute, I was
hoping it might be possible to give result a mode(DI) attribute, but the
compiler rejects that.
Is there another approach that I can use instead?
Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-22 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-22 15:30 Harald van Dijk [this message]
2020-10-03 20:42 ` Harald van Dijk
2020-10-05 12:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-10-05 13:26 ` Harald van Dijk
2020-10-05 13:29 ` Florian Weimer
2020-10-05 13:39 ` Harald van Dijk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8985cc81-573c-b011-4e02-aa9829524133@gigawatt.nl \
--to=harald@gigawatt.nl \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).