From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28284 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2011 10:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28258 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2011 10:55:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:55:06 +0000 Received: by iyj18 with SMTP id 18so5257325iyj.20 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:55:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.167.9 with SMTP id q9mr6424221icy.1.1295952904724; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.230.66 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:55:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D3EA517.7070005@wippies.com> References: <4D3EA517.7070005@wippies.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error building gcc 4.5.2 for AVR From: Jonathan Wakely To: Kai Ruottu Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 On 25 January 2011 10:25, Kai Ruottu wrote: > 25.1.2011 1:57, Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti: > >> On 24 January 2011 22:49, Omar Choudary wrote: >>> >>> I am creating a script for building GCC 4.5.2 for the AVR target: >>> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~osc22/files/install_avr_tools.sh >>> >>> I have some troubles when building GCC-4.5.2, see below, maybe you can >>> help me; thanks: >> >> This question is off-topic on this mailing list, please send such >> questions to the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org list, as described >> http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html >> >> Since you're using a third-party's build script, not the GCC >> installation instructions, you might be able to ask the author of that >> script for support. > > The asker here seems to be the "supporter" :( Oops! Sorry, I didn't notice that.