From: "Shane R" <crazguy22@hotmail.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Linux c++ opmization--- linux runs at half the speed of windows?
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY21-F250BABA055D5D844068C13AE790@phx.gbl> (raw)
Hi,
I hope this is the appropriate forum. Please direct me to the correct one if
it is not.
I am trying to optimize a c++ application that I ported from a windows
system to Linux.
The app is a terminal based application that does some one time file io at
the start then runs completely in memory. After the one time io the app runs
successive timed epochs on the same data in Windows as Linux. The app is a
program that runs some code for doing non-linear optmization (math stuff).
The reason why I am posting is that I timed the time it takes for the
application to complete an epoch. It take twice as long in Linux as
windows?!?!
My system is an Intel Centrino Duo with 2gigs of ram. The application is
only using a fraction of available memory in windows and linux. The
application is single-threaded in both.
I am using Visual Studio 2003 in Windows and when I type gcc -v I get:
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release
i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-13ubuntu5)
I am currently using these g++ options:
CFLAGS = -o3 -O3 -march=pentium4 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall
-Wno-return-type
But I have tried every permutation of the above options to virtually no
effect
The average run time of an epoch in windows is about 3000 milliseconds while
the average run time of an epoch in Linux is 6000!
I don't know if it matters but I am doing calls to the rand() function in
both my windows and linux apps.
On another note does anyone have any experience with the Intel drop in
replacement for GCC?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Shane
_________________________________________________________________
Match.com - Click Here To Find Singles In Your Area Today!
http://match.engb.msn.com/
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 12:30 Shane R [this message]
2007-03-08 15:01 ` Andrew Haley
2007-03-08 16:10 ` Atwood, Robert C
2007-03-08 17:10 ` Sven Eschenberg
2007-03-12 22:06 ` Lawrence Crowl
2007-03-12 23:13 ` Artūras Moskvinas
2007-03-13 8:57 ` Galloth
2007-03-12 23:49 ` John Carter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY21-F250BABA055D5D844068C13AE790@phx.gbl \
--to=crazguy22@hotmail.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).