From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sunshilong369@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2403857C40
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:23:12 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2F2403857C40
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id l13so797892qvt.10
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=xIgWlBs6c1P8iFLKOZ4Cv7CxvnmyJZQXmmuPVty5wQ8=;
 b=UDb/x5ysCppg9tTY7JMhwCY1OhkNgnqnJQpaLsiBQFya2zFEkyrQu/PmrzmKGzroTJ
 O4XKUI9BkPTKlWumNycA8ffEOVGM1FRluz9cE22mKE4OYvZVppW5awdwxSJFeG9xnGWs
 O5I1aGBaPoYNiUAc0ZOUfN5IC1CdGzSsPmjw6he/yaqV+gEMOc/rlg8pNw8orerjSLSW
 afmQk1ckOEAata3wmlwvjykAEwkcJb//Y4weVD82KiX49G01Jsaboh1aVpdj53JuoO77
 WTf5czYQjlVEktFk8yoUsuqzmcSLfD3kK7RGAsjHxNbZIobbPnsRdrM/qPu8NngG9u6a
 6ecQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FpExCUhOOF5fjE+AGLz9L8R0dsXMQdLkSwr01muKySXUTxcuW
 PxtOcbgYVOLunOQ0J87uQaZEd2oWSjdRDFDgRH4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQdKfG8R/Pp8roryrOyM1XoLK+wpxHmMpdaEF8tT/BMbahFUQYi5jHn+XRojb2QNvDNDr0Qz7zm+BEw4Ppx40=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e981:: with SMTP id z1mr6175197qvn.15.1597231391661;
 Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAvDm6adHC5h=HEpz0rmsCK-CNG__JcgCuDmg+h4Fc6mEV6RZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPF-yObSfu+EkzeeVzZ9fe6BMM9JW-JhPcEXjb9+0dZxj0ELWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAvDm6ag4hDo6StTm7x-CdGefmWB3LQKZ0iq405vbK+1hXMgbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdTqGXZ+o5xSD0EDGHCREkvGmwA5piYNm6T9=TcqEPbdXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTqGXZ+o5xSD0EDGHCREkvGmwA5piYNm6T9=TcqEPbdXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?5a2Z5LiW6b6ZIHN1bnNoaWxvbmc=?= <sunshilong369@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 19:23:00 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAvDm6aSAGKe7qaB5fHiMm=XH1HcGiiFkAPq7pE15REqMuBy6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is realloc(3) permitted to fail when shrinking a block?
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>, gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF,
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:23:13 -0000

>This mailing list is about GCC, not general C programming. The realloc
>function is not part of GCC.
Sorry, I didn't notice it.
I took it granted that libc is part of the GCC since there is a folder
named "libstdc++" in the Github of GCC(i.e.
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/tree/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3).

One more question arises, why there is no library for libc whereas
libstdc++ is provided by GCC?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 07:39, =E5=AD=99=E4=B8=96=E9=BE=99 sunshilong via =
Gcc-help
> <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> > >If the heap's corrupt, yes, it can fail...
> > Could you please explain that in more detail?
>
> This mailing list is about GCC, not general C programming. The realloc
> function is not part of GCC.