From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw1-x112b.google.com (mail-yw1-x112b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529D73858402 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:35:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 529D73858402 Received: by mail-yw1-x112b.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2d68d519a33so25382617b3.7 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:35:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=L2GM4yk+3wDcLtM1oDb7wH5spZCQZKLCerOWRhc6hbM=; b=t7Sdn/hwWym0+VnJiPuPTjIo05pEZ//OxLm1fXBQu1bPMYcVNChWZOiUrojQ57NkGm Q0qzRZNsIA3X7oi/WOxS33bD0D1DIV37eHKWnUj7HkEEx4BrGOG/2Ku18pBo7dseNdHS TZqYUcbEDWEixWsgSOvPp9X9/Sh4ZLxC0cr8bb6i7AR3vnIIXJRk9bPlKmD/6zdTVVBj m4mEV3Bwkgp1JF/jYXUUtQBZ62YZOAoaRagqfcN1CmTamLuiZ9v43iahGxu/c393yggL M2DtazD5jBaa6hwPSudPThku9aD9K1dUh3AgJKXe2coifiQ7n0ujiiUQT8AT7Zs+r4jO GaHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326MsU+5k7hYsNx5zcHYrFsSSYooUq4147/CVIfOuMgVZIajD/m A0ujHQsTo0FgXT0YhjjzdgrLKDvOcFMZz9srIaHNXWui X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVCSgzJEjKsDh8AEnmUh7Rab3RIzoc/4v2Fx0FhkIjEDo08ebEV4G8cGH0VFmEcu79hOjbi+fPYSxJsGvhpSc= X-Received: by 2002:a81:3e25:0:b0:2d7:931:a5ce with SMTP id l37-20020a813e25000000b002d70931a5cemr6529724ywa.302.1645778116767; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:35:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6349834d9ea31f579b04ba9215b6449ce13f008e.camel@mengyan1223.wang> <1bb8ab09556727917d07ec31683996bb7e493fa6.camel@mengyan1223.wang> <20220224201334.GQ614@gate.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: From: Stefan Ring Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:35:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Libatomic 16B To: gcc-help Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:35:18 -0000 On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:39 PM Satish Vasudeva via Gcc-help wrote: > > Please let into this intel architecture manual , section 8.1.1 > > https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671190 > > I think Intel claims 16B operations are atomic , unless I am missing > something. Interesting. This seems to be a somewhat recent addition, and the mailing list discussion linked to above predates it. Coincidentally, I pulled a copy of the Intel manuals at almost exactly the same time as this discussion, and sure enough, it does not yet contain the paragraph about 16 byte operations.