From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com (mail-oo1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0195C3858D33 for ; Mon, 2 May 2022 10:02:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0195C3858D33 Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id y27-20020a4a9c1b000000b0032129651bb0so2518430ooj.2 for ; Mon, 02 May 2022 03:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rbziFXEAHPoPaA9i/s5wPpvRDEPXcDdAdGc7hZhiNZI=; b=wT0KHFZvWQnXj03ku4PoA81rpiWLNXIAdWUGUVwwf8MBPKXz/sfX1xS/fo0Xaz9J2I ZY9SxvjqOp9ha3mhyQ2iSO6eGvkjaKLiDgcv/es9B8kY0PHONUIz4e/BHRn/1urZTxNp 3PVPNE1eOMXl5PDky5hrGcaO007QFWhlL+ZMJO2eBlm60oHYx94c2DeWto8+0TCUpSoe 7k+SDpEQw8mOsrHS/omVZA05nRbyb9NWA2XS8VLX6ElHXnKEWf0JpCnUdKjETInoqodI Uefpuhb5Rhyf6tA0AXLskxGpWK+tjev6XlHUwtVw7CmBP+X8D3JtZLXvhvRBuYo/LOiT qyoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533B4T9waKPL9m8NStNamH5wMa3cRqVTwvMQPNnXc+/B68zK1xj4 cMBkTDcwm25cyh3DTP/QuV5p2AUPEnJOmYGgxTw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBXQ7TKslgi97FQT9hHQNwJtmZP8oUPv879bFB+jkvUhSMCBQRBUnfNRuvIpjwPe1HlcU6T+1WF/nzlLjIvf8= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:245a:0:b0:35e:964f:c41e with SMTP id v26-20020a4a245a000000b0035e964fc41emr3851529oov.33.1651485738139; Mon, 02 May 2022 03:02:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Zopolis0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 20:02:07 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_libstdc=2B=2B=2Dv3_failing_to_compile_due_to_no_matchi?= =?UTF-8?Q?ng_function_for_call_to_=E2=80=98operator_new=28sizetype=2C_sizetype=29?= To: Xi Ruoyao Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 10:02:20 -0000 The thing is, that builds fine, but I havent changed anything to do with libstdc++-v3. On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:29 PM Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:20 +1000, Zopolis0 via Gcc-help wrote: > > While trying to compile gcj, it breaks on a number of errors, many of > which > > are along the lines of "no matching function for call to =E2=80=98opera= tor > > new(sizetype, sizetype)". However, I have not touched this code, and th= is > > error does not appear on another branch which is a few months back from > > master. This leads me to believe that this is an error present on maste= r, > > although I have not yet been able to locate the breaking commit. (Examp= le > > of one such error:) > > Don't guess. Just build the unmodified trunk and if it fails reports to > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla. > -- > Xi Ruoyao > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University >