From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=+uI1=5S=gmail.com=nightstrike@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 036993858D33
	for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:16:41 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 036993858D33
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id k1-20020a056830150100b006864d1cb279so4663389otp.5
        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 05:16:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=t9CDHc8HQNBizx0W7qDDOQm3RGyGnGc/vHi5qEsA3v8=;
        b=YVHwWu802biKCvqpov88jLWm4eCCsyXwf23rWR1nZxJF24Dm4xOKtJwXJBevuXsg1+
         7r8BDWELWKkYQx6+wHPWegInAecedkCPj/UpFEpDBHL0tNi5jpumvnGAOCuPz/gHner+
         9WaF279VHq7j3UaoUS545DmwDzNDEju1Z324igKaHeZUL9ChElmwpWl3wYsxTdwHto5A
         C5WVUyJMORokxCpMrdsCmZ3tNrFrex9iH/IpwlgGyOimprnQHtzIMJVIR36Dmtl7cj54
         1Pn3VUaMp4Sd853p6Tn7uouun5TpzMTofczs4d7S7pMiUHiIBBOK1r5Q4fkgVhFCRzVt
         zrFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=t9CDHc8HQNBizx0W7qDDOQm3RGyGnGc/vHi5qEsA3v8=;
        b=Q4lS76tAZjGAaTMvOgBmppBvbwgox2nNPupHXYxG8rOCvP8O4sfodSFTx5cu5qpKim
         K2Jjp7FKtiih3bzdx2dfKRG56njwLdzTKeadbotenffIwL4DuL/D4LVRtB6xBLr7d/iW
         azTUaubQiRkjBYkgcRo8I78deXY3LpDLxpurAJqZtDTC5m01j+0MWimFpfa5818sJHa+
         QUn7RTYO678YjqVB485Zd8g7HPfv0SRKwNzb394ptsLb3F2Mfblc1krkxs0j/H7Q5c/T
         k9kfiGU+73VM+1AyB0S9pu17p8OPGM9zpXUx0BFvvutawObmcTQkCYuP2YRN58Lar0Ua
         hjtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp3gjFZb9huBQ8pRusUtv1sJYYZ56lSrlIql3ULVF8PcChyhKaL
	RGAni7yGLVlI6isnIOAlB28kOQ3f3r215pxB8/E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXugRIrQ+eWapDSfuzqQBUsT0E3UXu53QjfwMlhpjYOKxdHP9SIZx47hKliWuHHVwDUi2rDNJ33ZI0B9XDQI+qY=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f09:0:b0:672:6b44:379c with SMTP id
 n9-20020a9d6f09000000b006726b44379cmr1041560otq.169.1674307000269; Sat, 21
 Jan 2023 05:16:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C1829EC6-C029-4E85-A6E6-1C46E0FF8870@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1829EC6-C029-4E85-A6E6-1C46E0FF8870@gmail.com>
From: NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 08:16:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF1jjLtYTN+jEVqbq7crh4gte2KAjQU6aV_22HTQaUDVP4Srxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Executable size
To: Mike Rejsa <mikerejsa@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ff012905f2c5f965"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>

--000000000000ff012905f2c5f965
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, 22:47 Mike Rejsa via Gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:

> Hi, new to gcc, running 32b on an old Win-XP notebook.
>
> When I compile small utilities (say, treesort or equivalent, just console
> output) I get executables that are from 10-16 times larger as with my
> previous compiler (a 16b Aztec). Something that compiles to 7-8k with the
> Aztec is 100k+ with gcc. Why is this?
>
> TIA
> miker
>

Strip them afterwards. There's also -Os as an option.

>

--000000000000ff012905f2c5f965--