From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102032 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2019 21:22:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102020 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2019 21:22:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mail-vs1-f47.google.com Received: from mail-vs1-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vs1-f47.google.com) (209.85.217.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:22:49 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u124so187528vsu.2 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:22:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oGo3U3JjS33eiiOHKvxvgROPqzI6jwGF4xZPjz+gYrE=; b=dgKPMwUcxPnTdt4s+0z/4nG1FDXdQH/jG/6ES322vMR/22UsysqvLefd1XBQrc41db px0cj8rUlx9aRwI2i7Oae0rjQqqDneIuwgcOD/uipxgS4jQjbCUMRbrGAv0xbooe35OA 4xexg14lh6ika1OFwof1YLJddaSTSQme7Z130n945P95bLB3lepijsuuGbHbXJPi7zhW XPtDOfrNXs7DadbEn4YqBjT9ogQLUu/mfuRJPQ633AaTEDBTM7gG+xsiaTj1m6HG4Pl5 LfMfiS7oakHBq8XwWdk5p07wLyZ+IK7PaWhDvGbQd35wuPNPYyabEZnfUw3QaarKeuxI lmgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <853db68a-78d7-1efe-1e16-c6e126393528@ma.ra-doersch.de> <20190626124108.GM7313@gate.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <20190626124108.GM7313@gate.crashing.org> From: Jim Wilson Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Default debug format To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Florian Doersch , gcc-help Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:41 AM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > The problem is, that only "-gxcoff" creates proper (with AIX debugger > > dbx) debuggable binaries. > > > > How can I tell the gcc (i.e while building the gcc itself) that it > > should use xcoff as the default? I havent found anything working about it. I think that #define DEFAULT_GDB_EXTENSIONS 0 is what you want here. But I also think that it would be wiser to just use gdb instead of turning the extensions off. Jim