public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Kacvinsky <tkacvins@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: -march=x86_64 -mtune=generic question
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 06:13:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG_eJLd3hPam3GHXA+7Maj1McNW=JoMMC9PaW2+sCn5OL063sQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1e7eb6d-7b6a-06d4-c8ca-6a479174a732@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:12 AM Andrew Haley via Gcc-help <
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> On 5/25/22 19:58, Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc-help wrote:
> > Does anyone have a quick rundown on what would have changed between GCC
> > 8.3.0 and 12.1.0 in terms of what -mtune=generic does for optimizations?
>
> There was a vast amount of work done on many things, so we can't easily
> say what affected you. Generally speaking GCC gets better release to
> release,
> but bear in mind that compiler optimizations are often based on heuristics.
> That is to say, they make code better on average, but sometimes they might
> make things worse. If your degradation is slight overall, there might be an
> actual regression in the compiler, but chances are you just got unlucky.
>


I did have an idea of diffing the gcc/config/i386 folder between the 8.3
and 12.1
 release tags, but that gave a _lot_ of stuff about support for AVX512.

A colleague of mine reminded me of this thread:

slowdown with -std=gnu18 with respect to -std=c99

So I checked what the default C standard for GCC 8.3.0 is (gnu11) and 12.1.0
(gnu17).  So I used -std=c99 with the GCC 12.1 build of our code, and things
went back to normal (and sometimes a teensy bit better).

For what it's worth, the performance issue was death by a thousand cuts -
there
was no glaring hotspot, and least by looking at callgrind output.

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25 18:58 Tom Kacvinsky
2022-05-26  7:11 ` Andrew Haley
2022-05-26 10:13   ` Tom Kacvinsky [this message]
2022-05-26 11:05     ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG_eJLd3hPam3GHXA+7Maj1McNW=JoMMC9PaW2+sCn5OL063sQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tkacvins@gmail.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).