public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mizo 91 <mizo91@gmail.com>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: LIU Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: CreateProcess No such file or directory
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:11:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGt5VgFzXJkvFg333ZgH-GDKKCudSWRdKPFvf5Fh16d=eK1pQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90f24cd806655b052a2d1ac190e6b2ed53fbbfce.camel@xry111.site>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1141 bytes --]

pt., 23 wrz 2022 o 19:40 Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> napisał(a):

> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 18:50 +0200, mizo 91 via Gcc-help wrote:
>
> > Additionaly isnt -I flags required for preprocessor only? Why gcc is
> > trying to pass -I arguments to assembler program? Wouldnt you consider
> this
> > gcc driver bug than?
>
> From GNU assembler manual:
>
>     -I dir
>       Add directory dir to the search list for ".include" directives.
>
> So -I flags may be for preprocessor, or for assembler.
>

I'm not calling the assembler. Im calling gcc. Check what gcc manual have
to say about it.


> > Ok, if indeed this is a system limitation that cannot be avoided then why
> > is the clang compiler not having this problem?
>
> Because clang emits an object file without invoking an assembler.  This
> is a difference in the fundamental design of the two compilers,


Make sense


> and you
> can't change it just for some looooooong command line.
>

I'm not going to comment that.You do You :0


>
> --
> Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-23 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20 16:02 mizo 91
2022-09-20 16:18 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-09-20 17:17   ` mizo 91
2022-09-20 22:27     ` Tamar Christina
2022-09-21  2:42       ` fedor_qd
2022-09-21 15:27         ` mizo 91
2022-09-21 15:41           ` Tom Kacvinsky
2022-09-26  6:58           ` Re[2]: " fedor_qd
2022-09-22  6:44 ` LIU Hao
2022-09-22  7:35   ` mizo 91
2022-09-22  9:46     ` LIU Hao
2022-09-22 14:55       ` mizo 91
2022-09-22 16:04         ` LIU Hao
2022-09-22 16:50           ` mizo 91
2022-09-23 17:40             ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-09-23 21:11               ` mizo 91 [this message]
2022-09-24  5:13                 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-09-24  9:28                   ` mizo 91
2022-09-24  9:51                     ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-09-24 10:20                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-09-23 17:14         ` David Brown
2022-09-23 20:55           ` mizo 91
2022-09-22  8:19   ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-09-22  8:42     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-09-22  9:48       ` LIU Hao
2022-09-22  9:50       ` mizo 91

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGt5VgFzXJkvFg333ZgH-GDKKCudSWRdKPFvf5Fh16d=eK1pQg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mizo91@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=lh_mouse@126.com \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).